Răzvan Theodorescu

Romanian Academy

International Association of South-East European Studies (AIESEE)

Secretary-General

What Exactly did Romanian Post-War Nationalism Mean?

Abstract: In the last century nationalism as a spiritual element – according to the 1919 statement of the historian, archaeologist and philosopher Vasile Pârvan – was a blessed plant grown on Romanian soil during the ’48 revolution, the ’59 union under Prince Cuza, the ’77 war of independence and the preparation of such a national project as the Union with the Romanian Kingdom of several Romanian-speaking provinces dominated by two empires – the Austrian and the Russian – epitomized by Transylvania which came finally to the motherland on the 1st of December 1918, the same day when the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was born. In the nationalism project, the Union Transylvania was a political priority. But we must add immediately that in the events of 1914–1916 in the neighbourhood of Romania a symbol of the national struggle became what Nicolae Iorga, in a famous lecture of 1915, called “the heroic and martyr Serbia”.

Keywords: nationalism, Romania, Transylvania, Nicolae Iorga

https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1849183T

http://www.balcanica.rs