Милена МИЛИН

Филозофски факултет

Београд

ПИТАЊЕ ИЛИРСКЕ КОМПОНЕНТЕ СТАНОВНИШТВА ЈУГОИСТОЧНОГ ДЕЛА ДОЊЕ ПАНОНИЈЕ

У САВРЕМЕНИМ ИСТРАЖИВАЊИМА

Апстракт: Писци римског периода користе термин илирски  најчешће као административно, ређе и као етничко обележје становништва Доње Паноније. Иако према гледишту већине савремених археолога, у овој провинцији није било илирског становништва, илирски етник Амантини, подударност неких панонских и илирских антропонима, мит о Панонију као потомку Илира као и друге околности, говоре у прилог употребе овог етника, у ширем значењу, и за становништво Доње Паноније у римско доба.

ON ILLYRIAN COMPONENT OF POPULATION

IN SOUTHEASTERN PART OF LOWER PANNONIA

ACCORDING TO CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH

Summary

Following the Symposium on distribution of the Illyrians (4^th to 2^nd centuries B.C., Sarajevo, 1964), the view that the northern border of the Illyrians ran along the line even much southerner than the Sava (nn. 2-8) has been firmly established in our archeology; this attitude has been extended to the Illyrian tribes in Roman times (n. 7). At the same time, historians of the pre-Roman and Roman periods in the Balkans still hold the view of predominantly Illyrian origin of the tribes from Lower Pannonia, between the Danube and the lower course of the Sava river (n. 9), based on contemporary historiographic, epigraphic and linguistic evidence.

Therefore, the author dwelled on the issue whether the Illyrian name, and in which meaning, may be applied to the inhabitants of Lower Pannonia in the Roman times as well.

According to ancient literary sources (Strabo and Appian) it follows that the Pannonian tribes in the ancient times were deemed to be Illyrian (pp. 50-51). Furthermore, in mythology, Pannonios was the descendant of Illyrios (App. Illyr. 2; cf. Papazoglu 1969, 265 n. 233), which indicates the awarenes of common origins of Lower Pannonian and other Illyrian tribes.

Important evidence for this issue is deemed to be anthroponyms as well; Pannonian names in the research to date have shown to be different from Illyrian (p. 55 with notes). The author gives the examples of names Dassius and Liccaius, epigraphically confirmed among the Breuci and Amantini (p. 54, note 30, and p. 55 with notes), which she considers to have originated from Illyrian territory proper; this thesis is corroborated by a wax tablet from Dacia, where the anthroponyms Dassius Verzonis, Pirusta ex Kavieretio and Liccaius Epicadi were recorded (tab. cer. VI; cf. p. 8). As is well known, parts of the Illyrian population from southern Dalmatia were relocated to work in Dacia mines; that this is the case here as well is proved by referring to an Illyrian ethnic, Pirusta, as well as the name of the village. On account of the closeness in spiritual and cultural spheres, the awareness of the common mythical forefather, similarities or sameness in anthroponyms, there is no justification, at least regarding the Roman times, for distinguishing the inhabitants of Pannonia from the rest of Illyrians, even if the issue of their ethnical connection or identicalness is not taken in consideration.

http://www.balcanica.rs

DOI:10.2298/BALC0233049M